BBC agrees ‘substantial’ damages to William and Harry’s former nanny

Alexandra Pettifer, previously known as Tiggy Legge-Bourke, appeared at the High Court for a public apology from the broadcaster on Thursday.

21 July 2022

The Duke of Cambridge’s former nanny has received substantial damages from the BBC after false allegations she had an affair with the Prince of Wales were made ahead of Martin Bashir’s 1995 Panorama interview with Diana, Princess of Wales.

Alexandra Pettifer, previously known as Tiggy Legge-Bourke, appeared at the High Court in London for a public apology from the broadcaster over “fabricated” allegations she had had an affair with Charles while working as his personal assistant.

As well as the affair, the court was told Ms Legge-Bourke was also falsely accused of becoming pregnant with Charles’ baby and having an abortion.

On Thursday, solicitor Louise Prince said that Ms Legge-Bourke had not known the source of the allegations over the last 25 years, but that it was now likely that the “false and malicious allegations arose as a result and in the context of BBC Panorama’s efforts to procure an exclusive interview with Diana, Princess of Wales”.

The solicitor said that the “totally unfounded” allegations “appeared to exploit some prior false speculation in the media” about Charles and Ms Legge-Bourke, whose duties at the time involved looking after William and his brother Harry, the Duke of Sussex.

“After Diana, Princess of Wales, became aware of the allegations in late 1995, she became upset with the claimant without apparent justification,” she added.

Ms Prince said Ms Legge-Bourke “holds the BBC liable for the serious impact the false and malicious allegations have had,” adding: “Had the BBC not fallen short, the claimant and her family could have been spared 25 years of lies, suspicion and upset.”

William and Harry with Tiggy Legge-Bourke in 1993
William and Harry with Tiggy Legge-Bourke in 1993 (PA)

After the hearing, BBC director-general Tim Davie said the broadcaster would “never show the programme again” nor licence it to other broadcasters, apologising to Ms Legge-Bourke, Charles, William and Harry for how Diana was “deceived”.

In a scathing report last year, former master of the rolls Lord Dyson concluded that the BBC had covered up “deceitful behaviour” used by Mr Bashir to secure the headline-making interview with Diana, criticising the methods used.

This included using fake bank statements and showing them to Diana’s brother Earl Spencer to gain access to the princess.

It said the journalist used “deceitful conduct” to obtain the 1995 interview, which was then covered up by a “woefully ineffective” internal investigation, in which the BBC failed to uphold “governance, accountability and scrutiny.”

Diana, Princess of Wales, during her 1995 interview with Martin Bashir for the BBC
Diana, Princess of Wales, during her 1995 interview with Martin Bashir for the BBC (PA)

During Thursday’s short hearing, the court was told that in October 1995, the BBC was at a “critical stage” in negotiations with Diana over her appearance on BBC Panorama, at the same time she told her solicitor that Ms Legge-Bourke had had an abortion.

In December 1995, Diana publicly confronted Ms Legge-Bourke with the abortion allegation, before telling a senior member of the royal household that she had a hospital letter proving the abortion happened.

Ms Prince said: “As the allegation of an abortion was totally false, any such letter could only have been fabricated.”

She continued: “The claimant was extremely upset and confused by these events.

“She felt she had to prove to others that the allegations were completely untrue by revealing highly sensitive matters, including private medical information.

“Sadly Diana, Princess of Wales could not be convinced, even when incontrovertible evidence was presented.”

BBC Panorama court case
Alexandra Pettifer (centre), better known as Tiggy Legge-Bourke, a former nanny to the Duke of Cambridge, outside the Royal Courts of Justice in London (Aaron Chown/PA)

After the hearing, Ms Legge-Bourke said she was “disappointed” legal action was needed.

She continued: “Sadly, I am one of many people whose lives have been scarred by the deceitful way in which the BBC Panorama was made and the BBC’s subsequent failure to properly investigate the making of the programme.

“The distress caused to the royal family is a source of great upset to me.

“I know first-hand how much they were affected at the time, and how the programme and the false narrative it created have haunted the family in the years since.

“Especially because, still today, so much about the making of the programme is yet to be adequately explained.”

Jonathan Scherbel-Ball, representing the BBC in court, said the broadcaster was “extremely sorry for the serious and prolonged harm caused to the claimant and the historical investigative shortcomings”.

A spokesperson for the Duke of Cambridge declined to comment.

After the Dyson inquiry found the BBC covered up the “deceitful behaviour” Bashir used to secure his headline-making world exclusive, William issued a scathing recorded statement at the time criticising the BBC for its failings around his mother’s Panorama appearance, which he says exacerbated her “fear, paranoia and isolation”.

More from Perspective

Get a free copy of our print edition


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.
You need to agree with the terms to proceed

Your email address will not be published. The views expressed in the comments below are not those of Perspective. We encourage healthy debate, but racist, misogynistic, homophobic and other types of hateful comments will not be published.