Businessman accused of deceit attended event hosted by Andrew, court told

A judge has been told that the Duke of York was allegedly paid £750,000 for ‘assistance’ provided ‘in relation’ to a passport.

08 April 2022

A Turkish businessman accused of “deceit” during a High Court dispute in London with an elderly Turkish woman appeared at a charity event hosted by the Duke of York at St James’s Palace, a judge has been told.

Selman Turk had “sought to promote his UK banking business” at the event in November 2019, a solicitor representing Nebahat Isbilen, who is in her 70s, said in a written affidavit filed during the litigation.

Andrew, his ex-wife Sarah and both their daughters have all been named in the affidavit filed recently by Jonathan Tickner, head of fraud and commercial disputes at law firm Peters & Peters.

Sarah and Andrew
Sarah and Andrew (Adam Davy/PA)

The judge overseeing the dispute was earlier told that Andrew was allegedly paid £750,000 for “assistance” provided “in relation” to Mrs Isbilen’s passport.

Deputy High Court judge David Halpern mentioned the duke and Sarah in a recent preliminary ruling on the dispute.

He heard that Andrew had returned the money.

The judge said in the preliminary ruling that he had been told “substantial sums” were paid to Andrew and Sarah.

More detail has emerged in an affidavit filed by Mr Tickner on behalf of Mrs Isbilen with the High Court on March 4.

The duke’s name appears more than a dozen times in the 58-page affidavit.

Mr Tickner also mentions Sarah and Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie.

Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie
Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie (Stefan Rousseau/PA)

Mrs Isbilen had needed help moving assets out of Turkey after her husband became a political prisoner, Judge Halpern has been told, and Mr Turk had agreed to help.

She alleges that he “breached fiduciary obligations he owed to her” and has advanced “claims in deceit”.

Mr Turk is fighting the case.

Lawyers representing Mrs Isbilen told Judge Halpern that “total sums” that were “misappropriated” amounted to 50 million US dollars (£38 million).

Judge Halpern said in the preliminary ruling that Mr Turk had provided explanations for approximately two-thirds of “these sums”, but “no explanation at all” had been given for the remaining third.

Mr Tickner told the judge in an earlier document that evidence showed “money was used for purposes unconnected with Mrs Isbilen, eg, substantial sums were paid to Prince Andrew, Duke of York, and to Sarah, Duchess of York”.

The affidavit filed on March 4 said Mrs Isbilen “relied on a payment of £750,000 to the personal account of Prince Andrew, which Mr Turk instructed to be made from Mrs Isbilen’s account with Hampden Bank, as a specific instance of dishonest behaviour by Mr Turk”.

“Mrs Isbilen’s evidence is that she was told the payment was to be made in connection with obtaining immigration documents,” Mr Tickner added.

“Mr Turk sent emails to an employee of Hampden Bank representing (it is alleged falsely) that the payment was by way of a wedding present for HRH Princess Beatrice of York.

“Mrs Isilen has since obtained transcripts prepared by Hampden Bank of telephone conversations between Mr Turk, Hampden Bank and Prince Andrew’s private office, in which this representation was repeated.

“In fact, Mr Turk appeared at a charity event hosted by Prince Andrew at St James’s Palace on 5 November 2019, at which he sought to promote his UK banking business.

“Mrs Isbilen suspects that the payment was made for some purpose connected with the banking business.”

Mr Tickner went on: “Peters & Peters wrote to Prince Andrew in March 2021, requesting an account of his dealings with Mr Turk.

“Prince Andrew declined to provide any such account but … repaid Mrs Isbilen the sum of £750,000.”

More from Perspective

Get a free copy of our print edition


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.
You need to agree with the terms to proceed

Your email address will not be published. The views expressed in the comments below are not those of Perspective. We encourage healthy debate, but racist, misogynistic, homophobic and other types of hateful comments will not be published.