Government not prioritising economic fraud, MPs warn

The Treasury Select Committee said ministers must tell them what their plans are for tackling fraud and also said Companies House fees should rise.

02 February 2022

The Government must do more to prioritise economic crime and explain why legislation is being delayed, according to an influential group of MPs.

The Treasury Select Committee said in a fresh report that ministers should consider creating a new government department that oversees all economic crime, along with a new law enforcement agency to avoid confusion.

MPs also called for an overhaul of Companies House and to increase the cost to register a business from £12 or £13 currently to £100 in an attempt to deter criminals from setting up hundreds of shell firms.

The report looking at the Government’s proposed Economic Crime Bill said politicians on the committee were unhappy at the lack of progress and shared the views of former minister Lord Agnew, who resigned from the Government last month.

Lord Agnew resignation
Lord Agnew quit his role as Treasury minister over the handling of fraudulent Covid business loans and delays to new rules to tackle fraud (PA)

The former joint Treasury and Cabinet Office minister for efficiency and transformation quit dramatically in the House of Lords a week ago, calling delays “foolish”.

Committee chairman Mel Stride told the PA news agency the Government must explain itself.

He said: “One of the major reasons he (Lord Agnew) resigned is because the Economic Crime Bill is not going forward to the next Queen’s Speech.

“What the committee is saying on that is that the Government needs to identify or provide us with the details of what legislation do they think is required across this whole area of economic crime and what powers are already on the statute book.”

The committee suggested the Government “should consider whether policy responsibility should be centralised in a single government department”.

It added: “Economic crime seems not to be a priority for law enforcement. The number of agencies responsible for fighting economic crime and fraud is bewildering.

“Each of the enforcement agencies has other crime-fighting or regulatory objectives, and the Government needs to consider whether there should be a single law enforcement agency with clear responsibilities and objectives to fight economic crime.

“The Government must ensure that law enforcement agencies are appropriately resourced to tackle the scale of the problem.”

Mel Stride interview
Committee chairman Mel Stride said the Government must tell them what they plan to do to tackle economic crime (Stefan Rousseau/PA)

Mr Stride added: “There’s a resourcing question. The police spend about 1% of their resource on a crime level that is about 30% of all crime that is fraud related, so you’ve got an imbalance.

“There are things that need to be done in certain areas that are being delayed and taking too long to bring in.”

On Companies House, the committee said the UK charges fees well below the average for other European countries and that it should consider raising them to around £100.

Currently, anyone can set up a business in the UK for just £12, or a limited liability partnership for £13.

But MPs warn this could breed fraud and should be changed with legislation because current funding rules state Companies House can only charge enough money to cover its costs.

The committee said raising it to £100 would not deter entrepreneurs and could raise £80 million, which could be used to fight fraud.

The report also said the Government should include measures in the Online Safety Bill to prevent fraud and put pressure on tech giants to crack down on fake adverts.

More from Perspective

Get a free copy of our print edition


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.
You need to agree with the terms to proceed

Your email address will not be published. The views expressed in the comments below are not those of Perspective. We encourage healthy debate, but racist, misogynistic, homophobic and other types of hateful comments will not be published.