Professor Richard Thompson did not refer the 13-year-old to intensive care despite her displaying several high-risk indicators of sepsis.

A senior doctor will face no disciplinary penalty for failings in his care of a teenager who died days later from sepsis.

Professor Richard Thompson did not refer Martha Mills, 13, to intensive care despite her displaying several high-risk indicators of sepsis.

The on-call consultant also chose not to return to London’s King’s College Hospital to assess her in person as her condition deteriorated.

A Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) panel sitting in Manchester had ruled those omissions were misconduct, which they described as “particularly grave”, and found his fitness to practise was impaired.

However, on Wednesday the tribunal decided there were “exceptional circumstances” which justified taking no further action against the world-renowned paediatric liver specialist.

Martha had been an inpatient on the hospital’s Rays of Sunshine Ward after she suffered a serious injury to her pancreas when she slipped while riding a bike on a family holiday in Wales in July 2021.

Weeks later she experienced a fever and increased heart rate, followed by more spikes in her temperature before the consultant hepatologist saw Martha on his morning ward round on Sunday August 29.

Prof Thompson left the hospital at 3pm, but was phoned at home two hours later by a trainee doctor, who gave an update on Martha’s condition.

Medical records showed she had deteriorated over the course of the afternoon, and into the early evening, with a drop in her blood pressure, the appearance of a new rash and increases in heart rate, respiratory rate and body temperature.

Tribunal chairman Robin Ince noted that by 5pm there were “several high-risk indicators” as set out in the Nice guidelines relating to sepsis.

The duty registrar called Prof Thompson again at 8.30pm because of ongoing concerns over Martha’s fever, but she was kept on the ward despite the continued presence of moderate to high-risk indicators and the absence of meaningful clinical improvement.

Martha’s Rule
Following the death of their daughter Martha, Merope Mills and Paul Laity campaigned for the creation of Martha’s Rule (Family handout/PA)

Martha collapsed on August 30 and was moved to intensive care before she was transferred to London’s Great Ormond Street Hospital, where she died in the early hours of August 31.

Announcing its conclusions on Wednesday, Mr Ince said: “Professor Thompson has done everything possible to address his failings.

“The tribunal considered that the best way to repair any harm caused by his failings would be for him to continue to provide his specialist expertise at home and abroad.

“To now – some four years after the index event – remove Professor Thompson from practice, even for a short period of time, for one single lapse of judgment in an otherwise exemplary career would, in the tribunal’s view, be akin to punishment which is not the role of the MPTS.”

Among the “exceptional circumstances” cited were that there was no allegation or evidence that Prof Thompson either caused or contributed to Martha’s death.

There were also systemic failings regarding how the ward functioned at the time with regard to referrals to the paediatric intensive care unit, said the tribunal.

Mr Ince said: “A sufficiently clear message has already been sent to the profession and to the public – that even such an experienced doctor as Professor Thompson could still make serious errors of clinical judgment for which he will be called to account.

“The public would be aware that this finding would remain a stain on Professor Thompson’s reputation for the rest of his life.”

At a 2022 inquest into her death, a coroner ruled that Martha would most likely have survived if doctors had identified the warning signs and transferred her to intensive care earlier.

Martha’s mother, Merope Mills, an editor at The Guardian, said she and her husband, Paul Laity, raised concerns about Martha’s deteriorating health a number of times but these were not acted on.

The couple later successfully campaigned for Martha’s Rule to give patients, families and carers the chance to easily request a second opinion from a senior doctor in the same hospital in the event of a suspected deterioration or serious concern.

More from Perspective

Get a free copy of our print edition

News

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.
You need to agree with the terms to proceed

Your email address will not be published. The views expressed in the comments below are not those of Perspective. We encourage healthy debate, but racist, misogynistic, homophobic and other types of hateful comments will not be published.