The priceless legacy of the revolutionary doctors and scientists who led the battle against Strep A
In the run up to Christmas, Covid was knocked off the headlines by a far older threat to human health – one that’s bedevilled us for centuries. UK doctors reported an increase in the number of cases of serious Group A streptococcus (Group A Strep) infections, mostly among children, deeply troubling a public only just recovering from the effects of a global pandemic. At the same time, many were successfully treated as a result of discoveries and treatments that have evolved thanks to doctors and scientists metaphorically passing the torch to each other down the centuries.
Between five and fifteen per cent of healthy children have Strep A on their throats at any given time
Group A Strep is, of course, a bacterium rather than a virus, one of a great many variants from the family of streptococci. They are round bacteria that travel around in chains (hence the name: from Greek strep meaning chain and kokkos meaning berry). The Group A tag comes from how it’s identified from its cousins in the laboratory. Group A Strep commonly lives and grows on us without causing problems or anyone knowing it’s even there; it’s generally thought between five and fifteen per cent of healthy children have it on their throats at any given time without ever noticing. However, the bacteria occasionally cause active infection including infected tonsils, skin infections (especially after burns), a more generalised infection causing fever and dry red skin in children (scarlet fever) and, more lethally, it can lead to infections in deeper reaches of the body like the lungs or the bloodstream. Long-term consequences can also include rheumatic heart disease, which globally claims nearly 290,000 lives a year – mostly in low-income countries, according to the WHO. So the history of Strep A is necessarily intertwined with the story of human frailty.
There is still international debate over who identified Group A strep infection first, with familiar descriptions appearing in writings from Ancient Greece and Rome, and later across Europe in the sixteenth century. It seems likely that the Europeans took it with them to the New Worlds, part of a cocktail of bacteria that ravaged native populations. But it wasn’t until the seventeenth century that there was a more recognisable description, by a physician known as the “British Hippocrates”, Thomas Sydenham. He was a rare medic for his age in that he systematically recorded the specific features of different diseases. In his seminal texts Methodis Curandis Febres (1666) and Observationes Medicae (1676) Sydenham sets down the first description of “scarletina”, which we know as scarlet fever.
Thomas Sydenham set down the first description of “scarletina”, which we know as scarlet fever
Sydenham was revolutionary in more ways than one, abandoning his studies in Royalist Oxford during the English Civil War to do battle as a Roundhead, in the process sustaining injuries that would plague him for life, leading Cromwell to award him a gratuity. The money allowed Sydenham to marry and quit Oxford, where he’d gained medical qualification, and move to “marshy” Westminster. Despite being a great categoriser, Sydenham’s treatments weren’t innovative, nor were they in keeping with the prevailing theories of the causes of illness at the time. Shockingly, he recommended that children with scarlatina should have their necks blistered with a hot iron, with opium to relieve the pain.
It wasn’t until the nineteenth century that the idea of an actual bacteria behind Group A Strep disease was accepted by the medical profession, and it’s impossible to overstate how seismic that recognition was. The genius of that “eureka!” moment, and the dogged determination required to change prevailing beliefs and treatments in its wake, was the result of careful observation and experimentation, involving entities which nobody could physically see at the time. It was the Austrian surgeon, Theodor Billroth, who looked down a microscope at pus from a wound and who described, and for the first time named, the tiny round chains of bacteria he saw.