Once upon a time, in the Land of Make-Believe, a lonely president called Donald tweeted at all hours of the day, offering fantastic stories about his life. One Christmas Donald tweeted that he was working hard in the Oval Office. But even in the Land of Make-Believe facts and evidence still existed. When an American president works in the Oval Office, a US Marine Corps guard stands outside under the portico and is visible to any passerby from Pennsylvania Avenue. There was no Marine guard. There was therefore no president hard at work, except possibly on a golf course. Most Americans knew Donald Trump was lying. He often did. But what was astounding was that for tens of millions it made no difference – big lies, small lies, lying about “winning” a “stolen” election, or being against the 2003 Iraq War when publicly he supported it, or even the “popularity” of his 2017 inauguration, when every TV viewer could see how poorly attended it was.

Trump’s lying output was extraordinary. By 13 July 2020 The Washington Post reported: “It took President Trump 827 days to top 10,000 false and misleading claims… an average of 12 claims a day. But… just 440 days later, the president crossed the 20,000 mark – an average of 23 claims a day over a fourteen-month period… the tsunami of untruths just keeps looming larger and larger.” By election day 2020 the total was 25,000. Trump averaged 50 lies a day throughout the campaign. Americans were told that what they saw or heard wasn’t really happening, like that old Marx Brothers gag: “Who’re you gonna believe? Me? Or your own eyes?” In the 1944 George Cukor film Gaslight a woman is manipulated by her husband into believing she is going insane as a distraction from his own crimes. The plot depends on two things – the callous confidence of the liar and the complicity of the victim. Some 71 million voters believed Trump over the evidence of their own eyes, complicit in his gaslighting of their nation. In Britain, this all sounds familiar.

Bill Clinton’s lie almost ended his presidency, yet when I covered his impeachment it was clear Clinton was not the only man in the room to lie about sex

I spent a year of my life working on one lie. The lie was: “I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky.” I was the BBC’s chief correspondent in North America. Bill Clinton’s lie almost ended his presidency, yet when I covered his impeachment it was clear Clinton was not the only man in the room to lie about sex. Some of those prosecuting him, including the Republican leader Newt Gingrich and Congressman Henry Hyde, were hardly models of sexual probity. Clinton survived. He left office more popular than when his presidency began. For me, it confirmed an observation from a Victorian-era British statesman, Sir Henry Taylor, who pointed out that: “Falsehood ceases to be falsehood when it is understood on all sides that the truth is not expected to be spoken.” We don’t expect the truth about sex. We don’t expect the truth when ticking the box saying we have read and understood the “Terms and Conditions” when buying online. And we don’t expect the truth from Boris Johnson, because post-Brexit British public life is so corrupted that “it is understood on all sides that the truth is not expected to be spoken.”

In July the Labour MP Dawn Butler accused Boris Johnson of lying. For that she was ejected from the House of Commons. Johnson remained. “The Prime Minister has lied to this house time and time again,” Butler told the deputy speaker, Judith Cummins. Cummins asked Butler to “reflect on her words”, and Butler responded: “It’s funny that we get in trouble in this place for calling out the lie, rather than the person lying.” Like Galileo, forced to recant for suggesting the earth moved round the sun, Butler spoke the observable truth. Like Galileo she was punished for it. But, as Galileo himself noted, “Eppur si muove,” (and yet it moves). The truth, and the evidence, is out there. Everywhere.

Max Hastings, Johnson’s former editor at the Daily Telegraph, speaks of Johnson’s “moral bankruptcy, rooted in a contempt for truth”. Peter Oborne wrote a book about Johnson’s lies. So did Heathcote Williams. Its subtitle is “A Study in Depravity.” SNP MP Ian Blackford tried to get round parliamentary custom by saying: “I can’t possibly call the PM a liar in this house, but… are you a liar, Prime Minister?”

After Brexit “there will be no non-tariff barriers to trade,” Johnson said. False. “There won’t be checks” on goods between Britain and Northern Ireland, he promised. There are. “There’s no question of there being checks,” he repeated – and again, “there will be no checks from GB to NI,” and no “kind of division in the Irish Sea”. Johnson claims there have been 60 new trade deals with countries around the world, but these are continuity deals, not new. The government claims it is building 48 new hospitals, but a “new hospital” is now defined as an extension to an existing hospital. They have even been gaslighting us about gas. In The Sun on 30 May 2016 – a month before the Brexit vote – Boris Johnson and Michael Gove promised that “fuel bills will be lower for everyone”. In September 2021 gas prices rose by 70%. Visiting the United States Johnson announced he was growing “increasingly frustrated” that commitments by rich countries on climate change are “nowhere near enough” – the same month his government cut back on British climate change promises in order to sign a trade deal with Australia. Inevitably, when Johnson’s government ministers told the British people there was no need to panic-buy petrol, long queues immediately formed at petrol stations.

The lawyer and journalist Peter Stefanovic relentlessly pursues Johnson’s public lies on social media. He points out, in a video watched at least 35 million times, that Johnson lies about CO2 emissions, about restoring the nurses’ bursary, about free hospital car parking, the decline of poverty, the UK’s “unique” test and trace system, “record” investment in the NHS and just about anything else which takes his flight of fancy. Then there are the dodgy answers about £800 for a roll of wallpaper, the “benefactors” who helped pay for Downing Street refurbishment, the Covid contracts and all those Brexit-related problems from the shortage of agricultural workers and HGV drivers to lack of food on supermarket shelves – none of which, in Britain’s Land of Make-Believe, has anything to do with Brexit. Curiously, you may think, the government’s solution to the shortage of HGV drivers (“nothing to do with Brexit”) is to ease post-Brexit immigration rules for HGV drivers. In the 1960s the CIA coined a phrase to allow political leaders to lie confidently: plausible deniability. In Britain we have something even more brazen, implausible deniability. And when a cross-party group of MPs went to see the Commons Speaker, Lindsay Hoyle, to complain that the UK is led by a liar for whom parliamentary rules rooted in Victorian times do not work, the Green MP Caroline Lucas demanded “new rules for this Trumpian era of British politics”. The result was… nothing.

But you already know all this, don’t you?

Boris Johnson lies, but not because he is Nietzsche’s strongman, the Übermensch, determinedly solving problems. He lies because he is weak, a narcissist who offers only slogans instead of solutions

Every November (coronavirus permitting) a pub in Wasdale – a small village in Cumbria – holds the “World’s Biggest Liar” competition. Competitors have five minutes to tell the biggest and most convincing lies. The rules bar politicians from taking part because they are said to be too skilled at lying. This is unfair to most politicians, but such low expectations are easily met by the Prime Minister. There are those, including Nietzsche, who defend lying, claiming that weak people demand the clarity of truth whereas the strong revel in ambiguity and lies. Aristotle condemned all lying, while Plato concluded that lying is justified in certain circumstances. As Winston Churchill put it, in warfare, “truth is so precious she should always be attended by a bodyguard of lies.” I’m with Plato and Churchill. There are strategic lies, permissible to protect a nation at war, and there are selfish lies, designed only to protect a shifty politician and get him through the day. Boris Johnson’s self-serving lies gaslight our nation. He has no ideology. He has only a style. Johnson’s style is that anything good for Boris Johnson is worth any amount of deception, and his sniggering is directed at the stupidity of the rest of us for tolerating it. Nietzsche was wrong. Weak people do not demand the clarity of truth. Weakness is demanding clarity at the expense of truth. The truth is that complex problems – global heating, economic underachievement, social inequality – demand complex solutions. Instead, we are treated to the clarity and simplicity of lies, because, as another movie from the Land of Make-Believe, A Few Good Men, has it: “You can’t handle the truth.” Like so many of those in TrumpLand, we tolerate gaslighting from a government which claims Brexit is miraculously “done” even as they seek to renegotiate the Northern Ireland protocol; food shortages and transport disruption have “nothing to do with Brexit” despite the loss of agricultural workers and EU truck drivers; Britain is “levelling up,” and “Global Britain” is admired, rather than pitied around the world. Alexander Stubb, former Prime Minister of Finland and a good friend of Britain tweeted the truth that dare not speak its name: “Really sad to see what #Brexit is doing to a country that used to be great. Brexit is the biggest mistake a modern nation state has inflicted on itself in recent history.”

Boris Johnson lies, but not because he is Nietzsche’s strongman, the Übermensch, determinedly solving problems. He lies because he is weak, a narcissist who offers only slogans instead of solutions. He is enabled by the deluge of information in our disinformation age. Most of us do not have time to find the truth, to factcheck every confident assertion. We tolerate lies because we do not expect the truth. In Cukor’s 1944 film, the heroine eventually realises she is not insane and that the person gaslighting her is wicked. Johnson government gaslighting does not mean Britain is insane. Insanity is that we continue to tolerate it.

Gavin Esler is a writer, broadcaster and author, most recently, of “How Britain Ends”

More Like This

Get a free copy of our print edition

Current Affairs

12 Comments. Leave new

  • Avatar
    Matthew Stratton
    15 October 2021 10:09 PM

    Thanks for this Gavin. The key thing missing here is why he, they Gaslight.
    It inflicts upon the victims, who are trapped in the world of the Gaslighters, actual mental injury, which can be seen in the symptoms of #CPTSD.
    If you look at our pliant and docile nation and their self harming voting patterns, you will see the biggest crime in human history. Yes it’s trans Atlantic and trans Pacific. Government by Gaslighting is abuse that would not be acceptable on a one to one basis, but you have to know, with this most insidious form, that you are being abused, because it sometimes just looks like people lying, until you look at the poverty, avoidable death and suffering and ultimately wars and Holocaust level war crimes.

  • Is it not the oppositions job to hold the government to account?
    Why is the opposition so quiet?

    • Because, after ousting Corbyn as the leader of the opposition, the new leadership is part of the problem.

    • Because the hard left entryists and Corbynistas are drowning out the the opposition with noise, libels against Starmer and refusal to acknowledge that Corbyn was without leadership skills; a ranter dragged out of his safe corner by the pretorians and run by unelectables in the background. The voters still see them hovering and want Starmer to do the same brash promising that Johnson does. They know nothing of strategy, like the Corbynistas, thinking superficiality without detailed planning is the main thing!

    • Because they are owned by the same people as own our government.

  • Avatar
    England Peter
    18 October 2021 9:22 PM

    My daughter made a pretty big fib today and was caught oug. When challenged she said “it didn’t really count, the prime minister lies all the time”. She is just short of 12 years old. What despicable examples are being set for our future generations by our government. Lying is becoming the normal and will have much longer lasting consequences than the turmoil of the consequences of Brexit.

  • Avatar
    Pressler Graham
    19 October 2021 9:44 PM

    Spot on

  • Avatar
    Marta Falco Ainley
    2 November 2021 10:03 PM

    its called Narcissistic Personality Disorder. the lies are to protect the true self that struggles to exist at all . Look a bit into Johnson’s Mother and Father too. Trump is same and look into his childhood. Father , Clue Clux Clan member, just for starters.

  • Avatar
    Peter van der Mark
    2 November 2021 11:20 PM

    Just reading up On Churchill’s handling of the Lusitania affair in 1915. He was a very accomplished liar indeed; never mind his debatable playing with people’s lives in his effort to get the US to come over to Europe and help to snub out the German Army. I acknowledge the need of this strategy For Britain to survive that war; but wonder if that’s whyJohnson thinks he and his gaslighting measure up with Churchill?

  • Avatar
    British nationality.
    3 November 2021 6:56 AM

    I have tip on a policy that has not been subject to parliaments scrutiny as it has not been disclosed as such, it transcends all values and some more, underlying it is a blatant disregard for law of land and rule of law.
    This underlying disregard for law is continued by another policy in public realm but still overriding law.
    Masquariding as legislation.
    Both policies effect swathes of citizens.
    The 2nd time nearly 300,000 citizens.
    The third time the legislation from
    2nd time applied but this was waived as ACT OF GENEROCITY and 28,000 of similiar situation were not subjected to it as it could have culminated to a legal challenge exposing its nabulous legal logic.
    To day the tale can be told of legal obfuscation as even the legislation was wrongly interpreted in relation to prior constitutional legislation on the underlying constitutional status involved.
    It was time the stitching-up saw the light of day.

  • This is a decent assessment of the state of the country, but you’re missing one thing… you are right that the general public don’t have the time or resources to fact check everything that is claimed by the government, but the BBC do!
    We rely on BBC news coverage to do the fact checking for us and present the truth, instead we get “political editors” reciting press releases fro their “sources in Parliament”.
    The BBC is the country’s 1st defence against government gaslighting, but it has become an enabling tool for No.10.

    If one side claims that it is raining and anther claims that it isn’t, balanced reporting isn’t giving both sides equal airtime, balanced reporting is looking out of the window and telling us who is telling the truth.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.
You need to agree with the terms to proceed

Your email address will not be published. The views expressed in the comments below are not those of Perspective. We encourage healthy debate, but racist, misogynistic, homophobic and other types of hateful comments will not be published.