Vickrum Digwa was jailed for a minimum of 21 years in June.

Vickrum Digwa, who was jailed for life for the murder of Henry Nowak, is seeking to appeal against his conviction and sentence, the Court of Appeal has confirmed.

Digwa was sentenced to a minimum of 21 years behind bars in June after fatally stabbing 18-year-old Mr Nowak in Southampton on December 3 last year.

The sentence was referred to the Court of Appeal as “unduly lenient” by the Solicitor General, Ellie Reeves, last month.

But on Friday, the Court of Appeal confirmed that Digwa is seeking to appeal against his conviction and sentence.

Mr Nowak died at the scene of the stabbing (Family Handout/PA)
Mr Nowak died at the scene of the stabbing (Family Handout/PA)

No date for the hearing of the appeal or the bid to increase the sentence has been set, with no details provided about Digwa’s challenge.

After stabbing Mr Nowak, Digwa lied to police that he was the victim of a racist attack.

The case later sparked protests after police body-worn footage was released showing officers failing to give him first aid and instead handcuffing him as he lay dying, despite him telling officers he could not breathe.

When Digwa was sentenced at Southampton Crown Court, Mr Nowak’s father Mark Nowak said the difference between the way the killer and his son were treated was “unbearable”.

A day later, Sir Keir Starmer said that there were “serious questions” to answer about the case.

The Independent Office for Police Conduct said on Wednesday that it is investigating two officers for potential gross misconduct, including potential failures to realise that Mr Nowak needed urgent medical attention, to take action when he said he had been stabbed and could not breathe, and the decision to arrest and handcuff him instead of providing first aid.

One of the officers is also under investigation for potentially breaching conduct standards by dismissing the teenager’s claim that he had been stabbed.

The watchdog is also looking at whether race or religion played a part in the officers’ decision-making.

More from Perspective

Get a free copy of our print edition

News

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.
You need to agree with the terms to proceed

Your email address will not be published. The views expressed in the comments below are not those of Perspective. We encourage healthy debate, but racist, misogynistic, homophobic and other types of hateful comments will not be published.