Two more child strip-search cases being investigated by watchdog

The cases both involve 16-year-old boys who were searched in custody without an appropriate adult present.

01 August 2022

Another two cases where Metropolitan Police officers strip-searched children are being investigated by a watchdog.

The cases both involve 16-year-old boys who were searched in custody without an appropriate adult present at Ilford Police Station in January 2020 and at Bethnal Green Police Station in October 2020.

Another three cases involving girls known as Child Q, Child A and Child X, are already under investigation by the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC).

It is now considering whether to look into a further three cases, and has already passed another six back to the Metropolitan Police to be investigated by the force itself.

The IOPC has called for reassurances from the Met that it will allow children to have an appropriate adult present when they are subject to intimate searches.

In most of the 14 cases under consideration no appropriate adult was present.

The watchdog also plans to review a sample of other Metropolitan Police cases where complaints have been made, but the matter has not been referred to the IOPC.

It expressed concern that the Child Q search – where a girl was strip-searched at school while menstruating – had not been referred to the watchdog sooner.

And it is calling for a meeting with national policing leaders to investigate whether the issues go beyond the Met to other forces in England and Wales.

IOPC director general, Michael Lockwood said: “We have been concerned about what we have seen in the cases referred to us involving complaints about strip-searches of children, and we are acting now by making recommendations stressing that existing best practice and policies should be followed by the MPS at all times.

“Given the apparent delay in some of these cases being referred to us, we will now work with the MPS to review a sample of complaints that have not been referred to us, to establish whether the process is working as it should.

“I have also written to the National Police Chief’s Council to highlight these concerns and our recommendation, so these can be shared with other forces.

“I have proposed a meeting between ourselves and relevant policing leads to discuss how we can work together to ensure this important learning is shared and seek assurance that relevant policies are being applied in other forces.

“By coming together in this way, I hope we can address increasing concerns about the use of strip-search powers in England and Wales, in order to provide assurance that they are only being used when absolutely essential.”

The Metropolitan Police said that since April officers have undergone additional training around child strip-searches, and that an inspector now has to give permission for one to be carried out.

Deputy assistant commissioner Laurence Taylor, leading this work in the Met, said: “Ensuring the safeguarding of every child who is subject to a search is an absolute priority.

“What happened to Child Q was a truly regrettable incident and we have apologised publicly to her, her family and the wider community. We understand how much concern this incident has caused, and how distressed Child Q has been.

“We have been listening to the views of our communities and partners, and have already made changes as we balance the policing need for this type of search with the considerable impact it can have on young people.

“We will continue to liaise with the IOPC to discuss what more we need to do, particularly around reminding officers again of the very important requirement for an appropriate adult to be present during searches – a common theme in cases we have voluntarily referred to the IOPC, and one we must address.”

More from Perspective

Get a free copy of our print edition


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.
You need to agree with the terms to proceed

Your email address will not be published. The views expressed in the comments below are not those of Perspective. We encourage healthy debate, but racist, misogynistic, homophobic and other types of hateful comments will not be published.